Thursday, July 15, 2010

Deep Thoughts in my coffee cup...

In case anyone should wonder why I've been using this term..."deep thoughts in my coffee cup" it's because some of my deepest introspection's are over a steaming cup of coffee. Maybe I'm staring through the steam...maybe I'm staring into the cup...but my thoughts are deep.

So, without further most recent deep thoughts have been on the purpose of prayer. I read some really interesting things by CS Lewis...that hopefully will cause you to have some deep thoughts on this important subject too.

In CS Lewis on Prayer edited from The World's Last Night...

"Prayer is either a sheer illusion or a personal contact between embryonic, incomplete persons (ourselves) and the utterly concrete Person. Prayer in the sense of petition, asking for things, is a small part of it; confession and penitence are its threshold, adoration its sanctu­ary, the presence and vision and enjoyment of God its bread and wine. In it God shows Himself to us. That He answers prayers is a corollary—not necessarily the most important one—from that revelation. What He does is learned from what He is."

Petitionary prayer is, nonetheless, both allowed and commanded to us: “Give us our daily bread.” And no doubt it raises a theoretical problem. Can we believe that God ever really modifies His action in response to the suggestions of men? For infinite wisdom does not need telling what is best, and infinite goodness needs no urging to do it. But neither does God need any of those things that are done by finite agents, whether living or inanimate.

Of course, that raises the question...Why bother to pray?

He could, if He chose, repair our bodies miraculously without food; or give us food without the aid of farmers, bakers, and butchers; or knowledge without the aid of learned men; or convert the heathen without missionaries. Instead, He allows soils and weather and animals and the muscles, minds, and wills of men to co-operate in the execution of His will. “God,” said Pascal, “instituted prayer in order to lend to His creatures the dignity of causality.” But not only prayer; whenever we act at all He lends us that dignity. It is not really stranger, nor less strange, that my prayers should affect the course of events than that my other actions should do so. They have not advised or changed God's mind—that is, His over-all purpose. But that purpose will be realized in different ways according to the actions, including the prayers, of His creatures. So at least it seems to me. But what I have offered can be, at the very best, only a mental model or symbol. All that we say on such subjects must be merely analogical and parabolic. The reality is doubtless not comprehensible by our faculties. But we can at any rate try to expel bad analogies and bad parables."

He continues for several more paragraphs in which he suggests that the more mature the Christian the less God seems to answer certain prayers...and the more emphatic is the NO. I don't like that part at all. This last quote concludes well...

"Prayer is not a machine. It is not magic. It is not advice offered to God. Our act, when we pray, must not, any more than all our other acts, be separated from the continuous act of God Himself, in which alone all finite causes operate."

1 comment:

nannykim said...

Lewis will always give you deep thoughts over your coffee cup ;-). Chan has been doing it to me this week.